Google Organics with SearchForOrganics.com

Spy Associates

Royal Canadian Mint

Monday, February 13, 2023

The Truth Behind the Collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 on September 11th, 2001

The events of September 11th, 2001, have been the subject of numerous conspiracy theories, including the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7. This 47-story skyscraper, located near the World Trade Center complex, was not hit by an aircraft but still collapsed later that day. Conspiracy theorists have claimed that the building was brought down by controlled demolition, rather than as a result of the damage it sustained from the fall of the nearby World Trade Center towers. One piece of evidence cited by conspiracy theorists is a statement made by Larry Silverstein, the leaseholder of the World Trade Center complex, in which he referred to the decision to "pull it."

However, the context of Silverstein's statement has been widely misunderstood, and his words have been taken out of context. In an interview with PBS, Silverstein stated that the fire department made the decision to "pull" firefighters out of the building due to the dangerous conditions, and that this decision was made in reference to the practice of controlled demolition, in which buildings are intentionally brought down to minimize collateral damage. In this context, "pull" refers to the removal of firefighters, not the demolition of the building.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) conducted a comprehensive investigation into the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 and the World Trade Center towers. The NIST found that the collapse of Building 7 was the result of fires that ignited on multiple floors as a result of the damage sustained from the fall of the nearby towers. The NIST concluded that the fire, which was fueled by the building's contents, including office furnishings and paper, caused structural steel members to heat and eventually lose their load-bearing capacity. This, combined with other factors such as the effects of thermal expansion, caused a progressive collapse of the building. The NIST's findings were based on a thorough examination of physical evidence, including steel members, fireproofing materials, and the structural components of the building, as well as computer simulations of the building's response to the conditions on September 11th.

It is important to rely on credible and established sources of information and to be cautious of conspiracy theories that are not based on evidence. Such theories often rely on speculation, misinformation, and a lack of understanding of the available data. The events of September 11th were a tragedy that resulted in the loss of thousands of innocent lives, and it is important to ensure that the truth about what happened that day is accurately remembered and understood.

In conclusion, the theory that World Trade Center Building 7 was brought down by controlled demolition on September 11th, 2001, is not supported by credible evidence and has been thoroughly discredited by official investigations and independent experts. The evidence clearly supports the conclusion that the collapse of the building was the result of fires that ignited as a result of the damage sustained from the fall of the nearby World Trade Center towers. The statement made by Larry Silverstein, in which he referred to the decision to "pull it," has been widely misunderstood and taken out of context. In reality, his statement referred to the decision to remove firefighters from the building, not the demolition of the building.

No comments:

Post a Comment


Blog Archive

Warning - Disclaimer

WARNING: **Disclaimer:** This blog is for informational and educational purposes only and does not promote illegal or unethical espionage. The author is a researcher who analyzes publicly available information for her own clients and the public. The views expressed are the author's own and do not reflect any organization or government. The author makes no guarantees about the accuracy or completeness of the information provided. Reliance on the information is at your own risk. The author is not liable for any loss or damage resulting from the use of the information. The author reserves the right to modify or delete content without notice. By using this open source intelligence (OSINT) blog, you agree to these terms. If you disagree, please do not use this blog. -Marie Seshat Landry

Pixel