10 reasons why there is no logic to the prohibition of hemp, and why its based in slavery, usury and racism.

1. Lack of evidence of harm: Hemp, which is a strain of the Cannabis sativa plant, has a low THC content and does not produce the psychoactive effects associated with marijuana use. There is no scientific evidence to support the idea that hemp is harmful to public health or safety.

2. Misunderstanding of hemp's effects: Hemp has been stigmatized due to its association with marijuana, despite the fact that it is a different plant with different effects. This misunderstanding has contributed to the prohibition of hemp.

3. Historical racial and socioeconomic biases: The prohibition of hemp and other psychoactive substances has roots in racist and anti-immigrant sentiments, as well as anti-poor biases. These biases were used to justify the criminalization of marijuana and other substances in the early 20th century.

4. Financial interests of the paper and pharmaceutical industries: The paper and pharmaceutical industries have historically opposed the legalization of hemp due to the threat it posed to their profits. Hemp was once used as a cheap and versatile alternative to wood for paper production, and its medicinal properties were seen as a threat to the pharmaceutical industry.

5. Connection to slavery and usury: The criminalization of hemp and other psychoactive substances can be traced back to the colonial era, where they were used as a means of control over enslaved populations and to generate profits through taxes and penalties.

6. Lack of understanding of hemp's versatility: Hemp has a wide range of uses, including in textiles, food, fuel, and building materials, among others. Despite its versatility, hemp was criminalized due to misconceptions about its effects and the influence of financial interests.

7. Resistance to change: The prohibition of hemp and other psychoactive substances reflects a resistance to change and a refusal to acknowledge the benefits of these substances. This resistance has been fueled by fear, ignorance, and a desire to maintain the status quo.

8. Science and research suppressed: The prohibition of hemp has limited scientific research and investigation into the plant's properties and benefits, resulting in a lack of knowledge and understanding about its true effects.

9. Lack of evidence-based policy: The prohibition of hemp was not based on scientific evidence or research, but rather on political, social, and economic factors. This lack of evidence-based policy has contributed to the ongoing criminalization of hemp and other psychoactive substances.

10. Failure to address the root causes of drug abuse: The prohibition of hemp and other psychoactive substances has not addressed the root causes of drug abuse, including poverty, trauma, and mental health issues. This has resulted in a criminal justice system that punishes individuals for using drugs, rather than providing them with the support and resources they need to overcome addiction and lead healthier lives.