Universal Declaration of the Right to Kill for Self-Defense and Defending the Defenceless 007

 **Universal Declaration of the Right to Kill for Self-Defense and Defending the Defenceless**

**Preamble**

Recognizing the inherent right of every individual to life, liberty, and security,

Acknowledging that the protection of life and the prevention of harm are fundamental

responsibilities of society,

Believing that individuals have the right to defend themselves and others from

imminent threats to their safety,

We, the representatives of the peoples of the world, hereby proclaim this Universal

Declaration of the Right to Kill for Self-Defense and Defending the Defenceless.

**Article 1**

Every individual has the inherent right to kill in self-defense or to defend the

defenceless against imminent threats to their life or bodily integrity.

**Article 2**

The use of lethal force is justified only when:

* The threat is imminent and cannot be reasonably avoided or mitigated by other

means;

* The use of lethal force is necessary to prevent imminent death or serious bodily

harm;

* The person using lethal force has a reasonable belief that the threat is real and

imminent.

**Article 3**

The burden of proof lies with the person using lethal force to demonstrate that the

use of such force was justified under the principles set forth in Article 2.

**Article 4**

States shall ensure that individuals have access to effective legal and procedural

mechanisms to protect their right to kill for self-defense and defending the

defenceless.

**Article 5**

States shall provide training and education to law enforcement officers and other

relevant personnel on the principles of self-defense and the use of lethal force.

**Article 6**

States shall take all necessary measures to prevent the abuse of the right to kill for

self-defense and defending the defenceless.

**Article 7**

This Declaration shall not be interpreted as authorizing the use of lethal force for any

purpose other than self-defense or defending the defenceless.

**Article 8**

This Declaration shall not be interpreted as limiting the right of individuals to seek

other lawful means of protection, such as fleeing the scene or seeking assistance

from law enforcement.

**Article 9**

This Declaration shall be universally recognized and respected.

**Conclusion**

This Universal Declaration of the Right to Kill for Self-Defense and Defending the

Defenceless affirms the fundamental right of individuals to protect themselves and

others from imminent threats to their safety. It establishes clear principles for the

justified use of lethal force and places the burden of proof on the person using such

force.

By recognizing the right to self-defense and defending the defenceless, this

Declaration promotes a society where individuals can live in safety and security. It

also serves as a reminder that the use of lethal force is a grave responsibility that

must be exercised with the utmost care and restraint.

We call upon all States to adopt and implement this Declaration into their laws and

policies. By doing so, we can create a world where everyone has the right to live free

from fear and violence.

Addendum to the Universal Declaration of the Right to Kill for Self-Defense and Defending the Defenceless

Addendum Preamble In the spirit of clarity and responsibility, and to prevent the misinterpretation of the Universal Declaration of the Right to Kill for Self-Defense and Defending the Defenceless, we provide this addendum. It aims to refine and detail the limitations and responsibilities associated with the rights conferred by the original declaration.

Article A1 The right to kill for self-defense and defending the defenceless is subject to strict scrutiny and must always be the last resort. Non-lethal means and de-escalation techniques should be employed whenever possible to avert conflict and harm.

Article A2 This right does not endorse or support vigilante justice. Individuals must not seek to enact justice independently where lawful means are available and capable of resolving the threat.

Article A3 The right to kill in self-defense does not extend to preemptive or retaliatory actions. Lethal force is justified only in the face of an immediate and unavoidable threat of death or serious bodily harm.

Article A4 The interpretation of "imminent threat" must be consistent and based on objective reasoning. Fear alone, without evidence of an immediate threat, does not constitute sufficient grounds for the use of lethal force.

Article A5 All individuals exercising this right must be subject to legal review to ensure the criteria of necessity, proportionality, and immediacy were met. Transparent judicial processes must evaluate the justification for the use of lethal force in every instance.

Article A6 Training and education on conflict resolution, self-defense, and the legal use of lethal force shall be made available to all citizens. States are responsible for providing such education to ensure that citizens are well-informed of their rights and responsibilities.

Article A7 Special considerations must be taken to protect vulnerable populations, including but not limited to children, the elderly, and persons with disabilities. The rights outlined in this declaration must not be used to exploit or harm such groups.

Article A8 The right to self-defense must never be construed as a tool for oppression or abuse. It must not perpetuate violence or escalate conflicts. The ultimate goal is to preserve life and promote peace and security within societies.

Article A9 This addendum is integral to the interpretation and implementation of the Universal Declaration of the Right to Kill for Self-Defense and Defending the Defenceless. It ensures that the right to self-defense is balanced with the responsibility to respect life and human rights.

Conclusion By adopting this addendum, we reaffirm the delicate balance between self-protection and the potential for harm. We call upon all States and individuals to adhere to these principles to foster an environment where the sacredness of life is the foremost consideration, and the use of lethal force is cautiously regulated.